TEMPLATE > archive-blogue.php

In August 2016, my partner Kurt A. Johnson wrote about the case of City of Montreal v. Lonardi, 2016 QCCA 1022 (“All for one, and one for all!”), where the Court of Appeal found that there was no solidary liability for rioters following a Canadiens game.

This week, a highly fractured Supreme Court addressed some of the common issues that arise in determining the appropriate jurisdiction for defamation claims when the harmful remarks have been published online.